iPhone X Won't Be Available to Walk-In Customers at Apple Stores in Belgium or France on Launch Day - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

iPhone X Won't Be Available to Walk-In Customers at Apple Stores in Belgium or France on Launch Day

by

Apple recently confirmed that the iPhone X will be available for walk-in customers to purchase at its retail stores when the device launches Friday, November 3, but that will not be the case in two European countries.

iphone x silver
Due to anti-terrorism restrictions, Apple will not be selling the iPhone X to customers without a pre-order or pickup reservation in Belgium or France. The news was first reported by the Dutch-language blog One More Thing, and MacRumors has since received confirmation from a reliable source who asked not to be identified.

As best as we're aware, Apple is simply complying with local laws and regulations discouraging large gatherings and queues in popular tourist areas, due to recent terrorist attacks in cities with Apple retail stores like Brussels and Paris.

Belgian and French customers can still pre-order the iPhone X on Apple's website for in-store pickup or delivery, although shipping estimates have slipped to 5-6 weeks in both countries. Also, in Belgium at least, Apple will begin accepting reservations for in-store pickup on November 4 at 6:00 a.m. local time.

Note: Due to the political nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Politics, Religion, Social Issues forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Tags: Apple Store, Belgium, France
Related Forum: iPhone

Top Rated Comments

WarHeadz Avatar
WarHeadz
110 months ago
Wow....thank god we don’t have this problem in the US.
Yeah, we’re much more likely to be shot dead by our fellow citizens excercising their “second amendment rights”. Or by a cop who “feared for his life”. :rolleyes:
[doublepost=1509477110][/doublepost]
and here is an example of why EVERYTHING ends up in PRSI these days. :rolleyes:
This thread by it’s very nature belongs in PRSI, which is why that’s where it was placed to begin with.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
D
domhoenig
110 months ago
Wow....thank god we don’t have this problem in the US.
Just thousands of others..........................
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
H
hagar
110 months ago
I live in Brussels, Belgium and I feel much more unsafe in the US where every lunatic and his brother are allowed to have a machine gun. Or where any minute the president can start WW3 .

By which I don’t want to minimise our own problems ;-)

But not selling a phone seems like a solution for a problem that doesn’t exist.
Score: 9 Votes (Like | Disagree)
69Mustang Avatar
69Mustang
110 months ago
No. But you said machine guns and I would like to know where? and if you were not in an area such as a military base, why you didn't contact the police?
Are you being intentionally obtuse? The argument you're about to make. The one relying on a pedantic textbook definition of machine gun. Yeah that one. Please don't. You know exactly what the poster is referencing. We do have access to AR and AK styled weapons. It's our constitutional right to have weapons and there are plenty of places where open carry negates the need to contact the police. But you know that already.
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
69Mustang Avatar
69Mustang
110 months ago
The one relying on a CORRECT definition of "machine gun."
I doubt the poster knows what they are referencing. Ever since 1990, there has been an intentional media campaign to conflate machine guns with single-shot self-loading rifles that bear cosmetic (but not functional) resemblance to machine guns.
No one cares. Seriously, no one cares and it matters little in the context of the conversation.

I'm not about to let it slide.
What are you going to do about it? Sternly word your post to note objection to someone mis-classifying a gun? :p:D No cares.

Not that it matters, but 4 presidents have been assassinated, not 2. I mean if you're going to get bent out of shape about the accuracy someone else's gun description one would think you'd care about the accuracy of your presidential information as well. :rolleyes: Not even gonna mention the 6 other attempts... oops guess I just mentioned the 6 other attempts. :oops:
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarHeadz Avatar
WarHeadz
110 months ago


Manchester?
Isolated incidents of terror in other countries don't negate the overall frequency with which our citizens are slaughtered with legally obtained specially designed killing tools.
[doublepost=1509507668][/doublepost]
Safer in Brussels Where you have no go zones where the cops are too afraid to enter? Which is a fact.
Jesus. Do you believe everything you read on Breitbart?
Score: 5 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Read All Comments
Related Apple News: Iphone | South Africa | Politics | Reviews | Motoring