Apple Watch Series 5 Titanium Models Weigh Up to 13% Less Than Stainless Steel Models - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Apple Watch Series 5 Titanium Models Weigh Up to 13% Less Than Stainless Steel Models

When the Apple Watch Series 5 lineup was introduced earlier this week, tech specs on Apple's website listed incorrect weights for the new models based on Series 4 weights. Apple has since corrected the data, providing for an accurate comparison of the new titanium casing option with stainless steel.

apple watch series 5 titanium 1
40mm and 44mm titanium Series 5 models weigh 35.1 and 41.7 grams respectively, according to Apple, which is up to 13 percent lighter than the 40mm and 44mm stainless steel Series 5 models at 40.6 and 47.8 grams respectively.

Meanwhile, 40mm and 44mm aluminum Series 5 models weigh 30.8 and 36.5 grams respectively, which is virtually the same as aluminum Series 4 models. And the 40mm and 44mm ceramic models weigh 39.7 and 46.7 grams respectively, making them slightly lighter than ceramic Series 3 models, despite having larger displays.

40mm
- Aluminum: 30.8 grams
- Stainless Steel: 40.6 grams
- Titanium: 35.1 grams
- Ceramic: 39.7 grams

44mm
- Aluminum: 36.5 grams
- Stainless Steel: 47.8 grams
- Titanium: 41.7 grams
- Ceramic: 46.7 grams

Apple Watch Series 5 pre-orders began earlier this week, with deliveries to customers and in-store availability starting Friday, September 20. Key features include an always-on display, a new Compass app, international emergency calling on cellular models, 32GB of storage, and the new casing options.

Related Roundup: Apple Watch 11
Buyer's Guide: Apple Watch (Neutral)

Top Rated Comments

Chopper9 Avatar
86 months ago
I can't be the only one who thinks the red ring indicator is ridiculous.
Score: 41 Votes (Like | Disagree)
86 months ago
I can't be the only one who thinks the red ring indicator is ridiculous.
Nah, but.... it’s better than the red dot on the Series 3:



Attachment Image
Score: 21 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Crowbot Avatar
86 months ago
I don't see the point of this article. This is all in the spec sheets for anyone interested.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
GadgetBen Avatar
86 months ago
I like the weight though. Anyone else?

I don’t like the aluminium ones as they don’t feel solid.
Score: 13 Votes (Like | Disagree)
86 months ago
I can't be the only one who thinks the red ring indicator is ridiculous.
It’s an improvement from the red dot ;-) but I wish they would remove the ring now
Score: 8 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Ronlap Avatar
86 months ago
How weird. I would have thought the titanium would weigh less than aluminum. No reason to choose titanium over aluminum for weight.
Durability, not solely weight. I am a huge fan of Titanium watches -- like Breitling models, but not ones that need to be replaced every year. Wouldn't it be cool if Apple created a "bare" watch module that could be popped into the case of your choice? Keep the expensive Ti case and swap out the module as needed, like this Omega Speedmaster.



Attachment Image
Score: 6 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: Sport | South Africa | Lifestyle | Politics | Culture