Why Apple TV Beats Roku and Fire TV for Privacy Protection - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

Why Apple TV Beats Roku and Fire TV for Privacy Protection

The Apple TV is much more private than competing streaming hardware, offering users a rare refuge from the pervasive tracking that defines most smart TV experiences, according to a comprehensive analysis by Ars Technica.

Apple TV 4K hero 221018 feature
The main difference is said to be Apple's approach to automatic content recognition (ACR), the invasive tracking technology that monitors viewing habits on nearly every smart TV and streaming device. Apple TV devices don't include ACR software, and that gives them an immediate privacy advantage over alternatives like Roku, Amazon Fire TV, and built-in, smart TV platforms.

The report also notes that during setup, Apple TV users can easily disable Siri, location tracking, and analytics sharing with Apple. In contrast, most competing devices bury these privacy controls deep in settings menus, making them difficult for average users to find and adjust.

Apple's business model also works in users' favor, since the company's primary business model isn't dependent on selling targeted ads. The tvOS operating system doesn't have integrated advertising, unlike Roku OS and LG's webOS, which display ads on home screens and screensavers. Apple TVs running tvOS 14.5 and later also require third-party apps to request permission before tracking users, although this setting isn't enabled by default.

Having said all that, the report points out some privacy considerations within Apple's own ecosystem. Apple's TV app collects data about viewing habits, purchases, and search queries to improve recommendations and Apple's services. This information can be used for personalized ads in other Apple apps like News and the App Store, but users can disable these features through device settings.

Siri voice requests are also automatically sent to Apple's servers. Apple promises not to use this data for marketing profiles, but the report notes that Apple agreed to pay $95 million in January to settle a class-action lawsuit over Siri privacy violations.

Despite the pressure Apple is facing to monetize its streaming services more aggressively, Ars Technica's thorough analysis suggests the Apple TV remains the go-to recommendation for privacy-conscious streamers. For users seeking maximum privacy, the report recommends using Apple's set-top box without an Apple account, as well as disabling all tracking features and avoiding using Siri or the Apple TV app.

Top Rated Comments

klasma Avatar
11 months ago

ACR feels like a pretty big violation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_content_recognition
Conspiracy theory: There is “ACR” in “mACRumors”.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
crisneat Avatar
11 months ago
In an age where almost every device is monetizing attention and behavior, Apple TV’s restraint is worth recognizing.
Score: 15 Votes (Like | Disagree)
WarmWinterHat Avatar
11 months ago

Really, don't you find it odd that the issues with the FBI just went away. Almost like a national security letter was delivered to Apple that forbid it talking about how it cooperates with the government. Remember the promises to encrypt iCould documents that are still not encrypted. I think some skepticism is warranted, especially given the way Cook warms up to other dictatorships around the world.
It didn't just go away, they (FBI) clearly said the reason why...they got into the phone without Apple's help. Azimuth Security cracked the phone for them for $900k, and Apple in turn sued them..The company eventually became Corellium, which Apple again sued for virtualizing iOS.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/technology/2021/04/14/azimuth-san-bernardino-apple-iphone-fbi/
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
11 months ago
I would say hands down because Apple is. It interested in nickel and diming people with copious amounts of intrusive ads. Prime Video has become unwatchable.
Score: 11 Votes (Like | Disagree)
11 months ago

I would say they've never been focused on privacy except in the eyes of marketing and public appearance. In reality, Apple is just as bad as anyone at focusing their interests on profits beyond the user experience or privacy. This is a Tim Crook/Greed problem that affects all non-founder companies. The CEO makes more and more money the more they screw over the customer and make the shareholder the focus. I would say Tim's years have eliminated any goodwill with customers over the shareholders profits.
Bro Apple literally got into a fight with the FBI over privacy. They dropped Advanced Data Protection in the UK to avoid having to comply with making a backdoor for the government. They are not as private as home brewed Linux distro but they are as private as you will ever get from a major multinational Corp interested in increasing profits quarterly. The data they harvest is minimal if you look at how Google et all operates.
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
breather Avatar
11 months ago
ACR feels like a pretty big violation.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Automatic_content_recognition
Score: 10 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: Local News | South Africa | News | Iphone | Buyers Guide