DOJ's iPhone Monopoly Case Against Apple Moves Forward - MacRumorsOpen MenuShow RoundupsShow Forums menuVisit ForumsOpen Sidebar
Skip to Content

DOJ's iPhone Monopoly Case Against Apple Moves Forward

Apple failed in its attempt to get the antitrust lawsuit that the U.S. Department of Justice filed against it dismissed, reports Reuters. U.S. District Judge Julien Neals, who is overseeing the case, today denied Apple's motion for dismissal.

Apple vs DOJ Feature
Apple asked the court to dismiss the lawsuit in August of last year, arguing that the DOJ's complaint failed to demonstrate anticompetitive conduct, harm to consumers, or that Apple has a monopoly over the U.S. smartphone market.

The government's antitrust case against Apple will take years to play out, but it will now move forward. It is not unusual for a case to fail to be dismissed, because when filing for a dismissal, there are limits on the information that can be provided and cases often go in favor of the plaintiff.

The DOJ accused Apple of a smartphone monopoly in the United States, citing Apple's restriction of third-party access to Apple services and features and claiming that consumers are "locked" into Apple's ecosystem. Apple argues that the DOJ is attempting to force it to spend money on enriching its competitors, and that it is not a monopolist because it faces competition from companies like Samsung and Google.

Apple will now file an answer to the DOJ's initial complaint, and a discovery period will begin where Apple and the DOJ provide documents, expert testimony, and depositions. After that, there will be a summary judgment with additional arguments, and finally, a trial. The case is unlikely to make it to trial until 2028 or even later.

For a reminder about the DOJ's antitrust claims against Apple, we have a dedicated guide that explains the details in the U.S. vs. Apple legal fight.

Note: Due to the political or social nature of the discussion regarding this topic, the discussion thread is located in our Political News forum. All forum members and site visitors are welcome to read and follow the thread, but posting is limited to forum members with at least 100 posts.

Top Rated Comments

10 months ago
Apple should just stop selling in the US market. That would teach these communists…….
Score: 32 Votes (Like | Disagree)
10 months ago
How can Apple have a monopoly when Android exists? I'm confused.


Edit: Don't get why some are "disagree" reacting to a question. Thanks to those who explained.
Score: 22 Votes (Like | Disagree)
AppliedMicro Avatar
10 months ago
More antitrust action against Apple is always good. 🥳

How can Apple have a monopoly when Android exists? I'm confused.
Having monopoly power in a legal sense does not mean that there's literally only one company controlling all of the market:

States the FTC ('https://www.ftc.gov/advice-guidance/competition-guidance/guide-antitrust-laws/single-firm-conduct/monopolization-defined'): "Courts do not require a literal monopoly before applying rules for single firm conduct"
Score: 20 Votes (Like | Disagree)
SBlue1 Avatar
10 months ago
Apple should just pull out of the EU... oh wait!
Score: 17 Votes (Like | Disagree)
mihighil Avatar
10 months ago
Apple should leave the USA 🥴🥴🥴
Score: 16 Votes (Like | Disagree)
HouseLannister Avatar
10 months ago
And Proton just sued Apple for antitrust in a case that reads very much like the Epic case.

https://www.reuters.com/legal/litigation/swiss-privacy-tech-firm-proton-sues-apple-us-over-app-store-rules-2025-06-30/
Score: 12 Votes (Like | Disagree)
Related Apple News: Local News | South Africa | Reviews | Health | Entertainment